Tarrant County, Texas · November 3, 2026 midterms

Tarrant County closed 149 polling places

The reported figure of 92 is a net number. 149 places where people could vote in 2022 are gone. 56 new ones opened somewhere else.

149Closed
56Opened
167Kept
−93Net
5Campuses
Generated from the county's published vote center and early voting rosters · v1.0 · 2026-09-03 · every figure reproducible from the workbook below
Every dot is a real building. Switch between Election Day and early voting, shade the map by what was lost, filter to closures, new sites or college campuses, and tap any ZIP code for its full list.
01 · WHERE THE SITES WENT

The closures and the openings are in different places

ZIP 76103 · East Fort Worth
Three sites in 2022. None in 2026.

Christ Cathedral Church, Sagamore Hill Elementary and Victory Temple Worship Center all closed. Nothing replaced them. It is the only ZIP code in the county with no Election Day polling place at all. Fifteen more lost half or more of what they had.

By city
City20222026Change
Fort Worth12989−31%
Arlington5937−37%
North Richland Hills127−42%
Bedford84−50%
Grapevine84−50%
The pattern
Heaviest in the south and east, and not only there

Losses fall hardest on south and east Fort Worth and on central and eastern Arlington. They also fall on Bedford and Grapevine, which each lost half their sites and do not fit that pattern. Both are in the data. Neither is being left out here.

Said plainly

Tarrant runs countywide vote centers. Any registered voter may use any site, so the ZIP code of a closed building is not the ZIP code of the people who voted there. This shows where capacity was withdrawn, not where the affected voters live.

That rules out the obvious next step. Joining Census race data to polling place ZIP codes is an ecological fallacy, and it is the first thing the county would use to discredit the rest.

02 · THE EARLY VOTING CUT

Five of the fourteen removals are college campuses

Reported as a net loss of three
50 sites down to 47, and the same arithmetic problem

14 early voting sites were removed and 11 added. The early voting rosters are numbered by the county, so both counts are certain rather than inferred. The five campuses: UT Arlington's Maverick Activities Center, Tarrant County College South, TCC Northeast, the UNT Health Science Center, and Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary.

What replaced them
None of the eleven additions is a campus

Two campus early voting sites survive in the whole county, both Tarrant County College. An amendment to restore UTA, TCC Northeast and TCC South failed 2 to 3. Switch the map above to early voting and filter to colleges.

03 · THE LEGAL MECHANISM

One procedural vote is worth about 184 polling places

Texas law says a vote center county must run at least half the precinct polling places it would otherwise have. That floor depends on how many precincts exist, and on August 4 the Commissioners Court combined precincts, which lowers it. The civil rights coalition puts the minimum near 354, leaving 224 sites unlawful by about 130. County Judge Tim O'Hare's own words, that the plan leaves "54 polling places that exceed the statutory minimum," imply a floor of 170 and make 224 comfortably legal. That vote is worth roughly 184 polling places of legal headroom. Neither figure has been independently verified, and the county has not published its arithmetic.

04 · KNOWN LIMITATIONS, PRECISELY

What this does not establish, and what is not settled

No demographic finding

Because any voter may use any site, ZIP-level shading cannot support a claim about who was affected. That needs change in distance to the nearest open site, computed per census block group and joined to survey data at that level. The coordinates below make it possible. It has not been done here.

Two sites not located

Sendera Ranch Rancho Canyon Clubhouse in Haslet and Light of the World Church in Keller are absent from both the Census and OpenStreetMap address databases. 431 of 433 records are geocoded and every point was checked against a Tarrant County bounding box.

Turnout comparison discarded

The county's own 2022 per-location turnout report extracts with its name and count columns misaligned. The join failed a check against a known published value, so it was thrown out rather than published. Whether closed sites actually had lower turnout than retained ones is still open.

One reported closure not corroborated

Bethlehem Baptist Church has been reported as cut. It appears on none of the four county lists examined. It may have been on the tabled 4 August proposal or an earlier cycle's list.

No claim of intent

Disproportionate burden and discriminatory intent are different claims requiring different evidence. Nothing here establishes intent, and nothing here is offered as establishing it.

05 · THE RECORD

Everything behind this, published

All of it comes from four documents the county published itself. Every one of the 433 site records is below, 431 of them geocoded.